agent_dani: (Default)
Sharp Dressed Dyke ([personal profile] agent_dani) wrote2012-09-30 07:53 pm

Learned some more today.

Apparently, my first therapist did manage to get some letters written in a timely fashion through the summer, allowing people to meet the requirements to get dates with the same surgeon in the later part of this year. This was during the time that she was unresponsive for me, taking months to write mine.

This makes for a clear pattern of behavior. She intentionally made longer requirements for me for both access to HRT and surgery. When, due to life circumstances, the longer requirement for a surgery letter didn't impact me she went out of her way to cause a delay (and, for the record, it did cause a delay of my surgery date, but not a significant one.)

[identity profile] cmcmck.livejournal.com 2012-10-02 07:28 am (UTC)(link)
Ye gods! Are people still coming out with terms like that? I transitioned back in the mid seventies and the terms 'primary' and 'secondary' were still being used for those who transitioned early or later like that made me better or more real in some way in their perverted etiology.

It was crap then, it's still crap now!

And don't get me started on so called 'regretters'.
Edited 2012-10-02 07:28 (UTC)
amokk: (Default)

[personal profile] amokk 2012-10-16 11:04 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, people are still coming out with those terms because the ones who did it then are on the internet as the "older spokespeople for transition related needs" and people who are looking up info, be they trans or gatekeepers or whatever, find that and don't find anything refuting it as far as they can tell, so they take it as gospel.